princessjohn:

omg u should all give me stuff to put in my about, like those shitty reviews you see on the back cover of books.

(Source: johnegbort, via 8e-cre8tive)

jerk-and-bitch:

wonderfloniumandfezzes:

a-bookworm-in-221b:

superblys:

starkiddestiel221b:

imageimage


 

JUST IN TIME.

JUST IN TIME FANDOM.

ALWAYS REBLOG ON TUESDAY

IT’S A LAW

EVERY.SINGLE.TUESDAY.

(Source: deanhasthetardis, via like-a-kiss-in-the-wonderland)

forgivurs:

i am so jealous of girls who always look perfect like can i be you pls

(via xshutmeupwithkissesx)

hamfarto:

hamfarto:

im having one of those unattractive days

i mean years

(via cumfort)

rubywhiterabbit:

calderonbeta:

feralcastiel:

can you imagine if twitter existed in the 1800s

abe lincoln tweeting shit like “wow this play sucks just shoot me”

too soon

HE WAS SHOT IN 1865 

(via madderziskickass)

‘Pedophile Protection’: Rapist Takes Young Girl to Planned Parenthood for an Abortion to Hide His Crime | TheBlaze.com

proudgayconservative:

thecircumambient:

proudgayconservative:

A shocking story is coming out of Everson, Washington, where a pre-teen was raped,  impregnated and coerced into aborting her child.

The girl’s attacker brought her to Planned Parenthood, where she lied about how she was impregnated and subsequently had an abortion.

It was August 2012 when the preteen told clinic workers that her 14-year-old boyfriend was the baby’s father — a lie that was apparently told to protect the adult male who had perpetrated the crime.

It wasn’t until six weeks later that she told authorities what really happened. As a result, in April, Luis Gonztalez-Jose, 31, pleaded guilty to second-degree rape of a child.

Idk what’s worse, the story or the fact you’re outraged at forced abortion and not the rape of a child…

A.) I was sharing a story from a website, that in no way shows what I’m more outraged by personally.

B.) If you read the article you would see that they specifically talk about the fact that this allows pedophiles the ability to cover their tracks and we are indeed outraged about that. 

C.) Who in their right mind WOULDN’T be outraged by child rape. I would think that would obvious. This girl was 11, maybe 12 years old. That’s horrific! But yes, the issue that this article is addressing is the ability for child rape to be covered up because children don’t need parental permission for an abortion.

(via whentherestrouble)